Elected Wet’suwet’en leadership calls on Canada to withdraw land and title deal

Five elected councils of the Wet’suwet’en Nation who say they weren’t consulted about a land and title deal between hereditary chiefs and the federal government want the agreement withdrawn.

The leaders say they were only involved in one preliminary meeting with no proper consultation.

“They went over it really quick, none of us that attended the meeting we had chief and council up there, we had hereditary chiefs from our band and a few our elders,” said Robert Skin from the Tyee First Nation. “I think we were more confused after we left.”

The hereditary chiefs’ decision to sign the memorandum was announced Thursday in a joint statement they issued with the federal and provincial governments.

The five elected Wet’suwet’en councils have signed agreements with Coastal Gaslink, the company that is building the 670-kilometre natural gas pipeline through northern B.C. to Kitimat on the coast.

The Wet’suwet’en are governed by both a traditional hereditary chief system and elected band councils.

Prof. Mary Ellen Turpel-Lafond of the University of British Columbia’s Peter A. Allard school of law described the memorandum of understanding as a milestone.

“It sets up a process to talk about their rights and titles and recognize and implement (them), and so we can start to resolve their land issues,” she said in an interview with the Canadian Press.

Asked about the position of the elected chiefs, Turpel-Lafond said it was the hereditary chiefs who led the negotiations.

“Of course they have internal issues. Colonialism is very destructive,” she said.

“But they are an extremely skilled and talented nation that will chart some new paths.”

Details of the memorandum haven’t been released but Wet’suwet’en hereditary chiefs and the federal and provincial governments agree it commits them to implementing the rights and title of the First Nation.

Coastal GasLink has government approval for construction of the pipeline, but hereditary house chiefs of the Wet’suwet’en say the company has no authority to build the pipeline through their territory without their consent.

Their opposition sparked demonstrations and blockades that shut down large parts of the national economy in February.

Elected chiefs say that the memorandum consultation process “lacked any semblance of credibility,” and they are asking for withdrawal of the hereditary chief’s “premature” announcement.

“The federal government, the provincial government and the hereditary chiefs have completely ignored many clan members and elected chiefs,” says the statement signed by five elected chiefs.

The negotiation process did not include openness or respect, it says, and fails to give a voice to all clan members.

“Negotiations cannot move forward until all parties agree to discuss governance amongst the Wet’suwet’en people so that we can work together with all levels of government,” says the statement.

In announcing the proposed memorandum of understanding, senior governments and hereditary chiefs agreed there’s a lot of work ahead in the negotiation process, including how all sides will work together.

Wet’suwet’en hereditary chiefs have invited B.C.’s Indigenous relations minister, Scott Fraser, and Carolyn Bennett, the federal minister of Crown-Indigenous relations, to sign the pact on May 14.

“We look forward to advancing this important work to implement Wet’suwet’en rights and title as three equal governments,” said Thursday’s statement.

The memorandum has been framed as addressing broader land claims rather than an agreement over the pipeline. It was reached after days of discussions in Smithers and work on the pipeline resumed after it was announced.

The dispute also involves other unsettled land rights and title issues, including who has the right to negotiate with governments and corporations, the fact that the land is not covered by a treaty and remains unceded, and a 1997 court case that recognized the hereditary chiefs’ authority and the exclusive right of the Wet’suwet’en peoples to the land but did not specify the boundaries.

The pipeline first generated widespread national protests in January 2019 when the RCMP enforced an injunction obtained by the company to dismantle obstacles on a remote logging road in northern B.C.

Larger protests were held across the country this February after the RCMP enforced a second injunction.


Contribute Button  

1 thought on “Elected Wet’suwet’en leadership calls on Canada to withdraw land and title deal

  1. I’m totally confused now as it was about 6 weeks ago I saw an article about the man camps being built and the pipeline going in at Wet’suwet’en? Then the article says the National Protests were in January 2019? But, they were in December and January 2020, right?

Comments are closed.