Day school settlement won’t ‘challenge’ survivors

‘There was a lot of re-traumatization.”

Students in front of Trout Lake Indian Day School in Ontario.

Former Indian day school students should have an easier time claiming compensation than residential school survivors, says a lawyer for the class-action settlement announced by the federal government last week.

Robert Winogron says day school students won’t have to testify about the abuse they suffered and won’t have to hire and pay a lawyer 15 per cent of their claim.

“I can tell you the government’s not interested in challenging someone’s experiences,” Winogron says.

“If they say they were sexually assaulted – nobody’s going to challenge that.”

Winogron, a partner with Gowling WLG in Ottawa, says the day school compensation process, which still has to be approved by a court, was designed to improve on problems that plagued the Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement (IRSSA).

Specifically, the problem with lawyers financially exploiting vulnerable clients and the “horrific” grilling of survivors via Independent Assessment Process hearings.

“There was a lot of re-traumatization,” he says.

So instead of being “cross-examined” former day school students will be “presumed to be telling the truth.”

Register here

The out-of-court settlement announced by Crown-Indigenous Relations Minister Carolyn Bennett will pay compensation of between $10,000 and $200,000, depending on the severity of abuse.

Winogron said it was was crafted so:

  • Only one firm – Gowling – would handle compensation claims to reduce risk of financial abuse by various lawyers,
  • An administrator would receive and process the claims.
  • Former students won’t testify about physical and sexual abuse in individual adjudication hearings.

But there will be steps to protect the settlement from fraud, Winogron says, noting the administrator will review and confirm day school attendance.

“The McLean Action – my action – is the only certified class-action and it’s the only one that’s subject to a settlement agreement,” he adds.

“My action governs every person who went to a day school. Period.”

The action is named for Garry McLean of Manitoba, a former day school student and original lead plaintiff in the $15-billion lawsuit against the federal government, who died of cancer last month.

“He was such a gentleman, such a champion,” Winogron says of McLean, who wanted Indigenous survivors to keep as much of the compensation achieved through a settlement as possible.

Already, the firm has 30,000 former day school students registered in its database and, Winogron says, is on track to surpass IRSSA, which has paid out just under $5 billion, as the largest class-action in Canadian history.

Gowling will receive $50 million from Canada for settling the case, plus an additional $7 million for work on behalf of survivors.

Survivors won’t pay any legal fees – again, says Winogron, to reduce the risk of being financial exploited.

Under IRSSA, lawyers were paid 15 per cent per claim and could charge an additional 15 per cent to earn up to 30 per cent per survivor.

Of course, as with any settlement agreement, a certain number of claimants can complete forms to opt out of the deal. Winogron says the number needed to scuttle the deal has not yet been made public.

As well, a consortium of law firms from western Canada is opposed to parts of the settlement, which is scheduled to go to court in May, and has filed material to intervene.

View the Notice of Certification and Settlement Approval here.

Lawyer and spokesperson Joan Jack said the group wants claimants to choose their own legal representation.

“They deserve to have counsel that they know and trust to help them,” she says in a release, “not someone chosen by the government.”

Claudette Commanda, a day school survivor from Kitigan Zibi First Nation in Quebec, says it’s hard to imagine Jack’s group is concerned about anything other than money.

“I believe they’re upset because they’re looking at the funds,” she says, confirming she’s confident Gowling will protect survivors. “They’re not looking at the money.”

Commanda, one of the lead plaintiffs now, says she agreed to let her name stand if the process was different from IRSSA.

“It cannot be in the control of the federal government or lawyers,” she says, “and you cannot traumatize the victims.”

Under IRSSA, there were an estimated 80,000 living residential school survivors compared to about 130,000 day school survivors.

IRSSA recognized 100 residential schools while the McLean action has 720 day schools.

See the list of recognized day schools here.


Contribute Button  

1 thought on “Day school settlement won’t ‘challenge’ survivors

  1. It will challenge Survivors. It fails to recognize trauma symptoms and provide support to manage them. It fails to deliver a fair process and fair treatment. It will isolate people and force them to go it alone. Worse, it treats survivors as transactions rather than individuals with unique needs, cultures, languages and experiences. Survivors deserve a fairer deal that gives them a voice and support, allows them to heal together and to educate the rest of us about why that is important.

Comments are closed.